Don't you love Google reviews? They're real people giving honest opinions about the products and services you need. Online surveys accomplish this same thing. We conducted one recently to see if we are hitting our target - help small business owners save money on payroll and save time processing payroll hours.
In the spirit of keeping things simple, we asked two questions:
As you can see, 100% of our customers responded that they saved money with our automated employee time tracking system. 43% of the respondents saved 1-5% on labor dollars, and 57% saved more than 5%.
A note about the 57% on the Payroll Savings chart - 20% saved more than 10% on payroll dollars out of that number. These results prove that handwritten time cards are indeed a money trap, which could be a result of employee time theft.
The chart shows that 43% of our admin customers saved between 1-3 hours on payroll processing time each pay period, and almost 49% saved more than 3 hours.
Our research also discovered that an admin's honest mistakes with handwritten timesheets can be costly. Reading and typing mistakes can cost up to 8% of annual gross payroll, while an admin spends 5-6 minutes per timecard each pay period to process payroll.
What would you do with an extra 3 hours a week?
Let's illustrate this further with a story about a fictional service company called Top Shelf Cleaning Company. Top Shelf is struggling due to rising labor costs.
Numbers for Top Shelf Cleaning Company:
Top Shelf Cleaning Company signs up for our employee GPS time clock system. Based on our survey results, Top Shelf should save at least 5% on labor costs.
Employee time tracking is a relatively straightforward concept. Labor is a service company's highest expense, and accurate timekeeping directly impacts labor costs.
Save money on payroll and save time processing payroll. Small business owners around the country say that they are enjoying these benefits. We verified - it's more than just our feelings :)
Let us help you, also.
Give it a shot for 14 days for free.
Footnotes: